I made it through the first half of the year without seeing a single movie in the theater. It wasn’t a goal or anything, I just didn’t find anything compelling enough to make me spend the time and money. In the past two weeks I’ve seen as many in-theater movies, and nearly every trailer concluded by bragging about the upcoming film’s availability in “stunning” 3D. I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised, given the trend, but I can’t shake the feeling that 3D is more of a fad than a step forward.

Maybe it’s because I haven’t seen Avatar or because my eyes don’t quite work together, but I’m not convinced that 3D adds anything to a movie presentation. To me, it feels like a gimmick, a new technology the entertainment industry decided would be the next big thing, not an organic response to customer demand or a natural progression of technology. I mean, how many people go to a movie and say, “Wow, this is decent, but it would be really fantastic if it was in 3D?”

Contrast this with digital theaters (sometimes branded as “IMAX”). This is more of a natural improvement, transitioning from crackly analog film to clear digital video and multichannel sound. Perhaps in a few years I’ll be eating my words, but 3D seems like nothing more than an excuse to charge extra for tickets and sucker people into buying new home entertainment products. It’s not even the goofy glasses or narrow viewing angle – these are things that will improve with time. I think even real, holographic 3D would be a different, parallel medium to 2D films, mirroring the relationship films have with books or videos have with pictures

Return to previous page